Inside a Statwell Intel analysis.

Statwell’s Verdict first, then eight sections. One fight. Data, context and tactical reasoning, organized in one place.

Facts and readings, kept apart.

  1. Data

    • Records and results
    • Measured figures, with bouts and minutes
    • Facts quoted from a named source
  2. Interpretation

    • Edges, with their size and reasoning
    • Scenarios marked on the record or hypothesis
    • Paths: conditions, not predictions
  3. Evidence

    • Source links under each statement
    • The sample beside every figure
    • What could not be established, said plainly

Fighter A vs Fighter B

Weight class · rounds · place on the cardIllustration of structure, not a real fight analysis

Statwell Intel

Statwell's Verdict

Which fighter the analysis favors, a qualitative assessment, the reasoning and the strongest counterargument.

Our analysis favors Fighter A.

Slight Edge, Clear Edge or Strong Edge

The reasoning, in two or three sentences

The strongest counterargument

The strongest counterargument, in a sentence or two

An evidence-based editorial assessment of this matchup, reviewed before publication. It is not a guarantee of any result or a betting recommendation. When the evidence separates neither fighter, the Verdict says so: No clear edge.

Style matchup

Where each fighter holds an edge, how large it is, and why.

  • Striking

    Fighter A · Slight

    The reasoning, with the figures it rests on
  • Wrestling

    Fighter B · Clear

    The reasoning, with the figures it rests on
  • Grappling

    Even

    The reasoning, with the figures it rests on
  • Cardio (later rounds)

    Unclear: the record cannot say

    The reasoning, with the figures it rests on

Each edge has a size (slight, clear, strong) and the reasoning behind it. When the record cannot separate them, it says so.

Tactical style clash

How the two styles meet, the scenarios the fight can follow and the factor most likely to swing it.

How the two styles meet, in a few sentences
  1. 01On the record

    A tendency the record shows

    The scenario and what it rests on
  2. 02Hypothesis

    A reading of how it could play out

    The scenario and what it rests on

The swing factor

The one factor most likely to swing the fight

Context flags

Layoffs, short notice, weight, camp and stakes, each sourced and dated.

  • Layoff

    Notable
    Fighter A
    What happened, and when

    Source · date

  • Short notice

    Major
    Fighter B
    What happened, and when

    Source · date

  • Weight

    Minor
    Fighter B
    What happened, and when

    Source · date

  • Stakes

    Minor
    Both fighters
    What happened, and when

    Source · date

Trend splits

Recent UFC bouts against the whole measured UFC record, with the sample behind every figure.

Fighter A

Recent UFC bouts against the UFC career, figures left out of this illustration
MeasureLast 3bouts · minutesUFC careerbouts · minutes
Sig. strikes landed per minute
Striking accuracy
Takedowns per 15 minutes
Takedown accuracy
Average fight time

Fighter B

Recent UFC bouts against the UFC career, figures left out of this illustration
MeasureLast 3bouts · minutesUFC careerbouts · minutes
Sig. strikes landed per minute
Striking accuracy
Takedowns per 15 minutes
Takedown accuracy
Average fight time

Every column states its sample: how many measured bouts and minutes it covers. Small samples are called small.

Performance vs Expectations

See how each fighter performed in past UFC bouts as a favourite, underdog or in a close matchup.

Fighter A

  • As favourite

  • As underdog

  • Close matchups

Fighter B

  • As favourite

  • As underdog

  • Close matchups

Wins and losses by each fighter’s standing before the fight, from the prices and coverage published at the time. Available once every past UFC bout for both fighters has a verified pre-fight standing.

Tactical evidence

Each note says how it is known: seen on tape, reported by a source, inferred from the figures, or a tactical hypothesis.

  • Observed on tape

    The tactical note

    Why it matters.

    Who watched, which bout, which round

  • Reported

    The tactical note

    Why it matters.

    The outlet and the article it comes from

  • Inferred from data

    The tactical note

    Why it matters.

    The figures it is based on

  • Tactical hypothesis

    The tactical note

    Why it matters.

    The evidence it is built on

Paths through the fight

What each fighter needs to make happen.

Fighter A

  1. 01

    What the fight needs to become

    The condition and the evidence for it
  2. 02

    Where that plan can fail

    The condition and the evidence for it

Fighter B

  1. 01

    What the fight needs to become

    The condition and the evidence for it
  2. 02

    Where that plan can fail

    The condition and the evidence for it

Research summary

The factors that matter most, the open questions and a balanced synthesis.

Synthesis

The central reading of the fight, with what it rests on

What matters most

What to watch

What would change it

The case against

What stays open

Limits of this analysis